Background Image
Previous Page  21 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

21

WWW.7X24EXCHANGE.ORG

with evaluating and deploying several

legacy network management tools

and bsM software solutions. this

experience allows us to share some

key considerations when it comes to

implementing solutions in an hpC-

driven scientific data center.

A. DATA CENTER OPERATIONS

one of the first factors to consider is

the way the data center operations

are handled. an unmanned data

center operations strategy requires a

complex backend solution to run the

whole process in an automated

manner. whereas manned data center

operations would require a different

type of solution, which is user friendly,

and offers the required capabilities. in

addition, the level of tasks assigned to

the operators in response to received

events determines the needed

capabilities and functions from the

bsM solution. these considerations

though seemingly primitive, are

important starting points that help

direct what to look for in a bsM

solution.

B. BUSINESS SECTOR

understanding the business sector

where the data center operates is yet

another key factor to consider. service

providers, financial institutions, public

sectors, and scientific data centers

have different types and architectures

of technologies, and, hence, operate

differently. while financial institutions

are more interested in keeping a tight

control on each single transaction and

ensure it is successfully completed,

service providers are more concerned

about infrastructure devices such as

network devices and servers. the

main reason for this difference is the

business objective, in which a service

providers’ business is affected by an

availability issue of servers and other

devices. in a scientific hpC-based

data center, however, the criticality of

nodes can be completely different.

typically, such an environment is

based upon commodity hardware

vulnerable to hardware failures and it

is normal to have several nodes totally

unusable for maintenance. hence, the

bsM must be configured so that it

does not panic on each node failure,

unless necessary. that said, a good

bsM solution for a data center in one

industry may not deliver the required

business value for another data center

in a different industry. therefore,

knowing what each bsM vendor in

the market provides and the

industries where their solution is more

dominant provides a strong insight on

steering the decision for the bsM

solution.

C. LICENSING MODEL

licensing model plays a crucial part in

determining the cost efficiency of the

monitoring solution. the licensing

model also defines the required

administration efforts by support. in

general, software licenses are

categorized into the following:

proprietary licenses and free and

open source license. proprietary

licenses grant the use of the software

solution to users, while the ownership

of the software remains with the

developer, and, as such, modifications

can only be done by the developer.

free and open source software

licenses, however, allow users and

developers to use, modify and share

the software and the source code

behind it. table 1 summarizes the

main differences between both

proprietary and open source licenses.

there are different methods to define

the scope of the license for the

proprietary commercial bsM

solutions. for example, they could be

licensed per monitoring point, which

is measured by what needs to be

monitored, e.g., disk utilization and

Cpu. they could be licensed per

monitored device, measured by the

number of devices to be monitored.

finally, they could be offered with an

unlimited site license model.

in addition, there are two proprietary

licensing models commonly used for

bsM solutions: subscription and

perpetual license models. in the

subscription license model, the owner

is entitled to utilize the software

based on the number defined in the

license scope. this means that the

cost associated with the software

Table 1: Comparison between Proprietary vs. Open Source License.

free anD oPen source

ProPrietary

cost

Mostly free.

free or paid.

copyright

licensed, credit given to

licensed by developer only,

original developer when modified.

user granted rights to used

source code ownership

no ownership rights.

developer owns rights.

source code Modifications

anyone can modify.

only developer can modify.