Background Image
Previous Page  29 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

29

WWW.7X24EXCHANGE.ORG

logical, relationships and

dependencies, as well as their

criticality to the business, where each

entry in the database is referred to as

a configuration item (Ci). the

information technology infrastructure

library (itil) treats the CMdb as the

central source of data for

Configuration Management process

to understand how the data center

assets are composed and services

delivered to end users.

while it seems that CMdb is an

integral part of any bsM solution, it is

also used by other processes such as

Change Management and incident

Management. thus, the decision

whether to treat it as part of the bsM

or decouple it is very important. that

said, by understanding the

demanding work associated with

populating and maintaining the

CMdb, it becomes more practical to

decouple the CMdb related activities

from the bsM framework.

by decoupling the CMdb from the

bsM, we can utilize more advanced

and specialized CMdb solutions, such

as bMC atrium CMdb and

puppetlabs’ configuration

management system - puppet. this

approach addresses the challenges

associated with controlling the CMdb

system, and maintaining data

integrity, validity and consistency. in

addition, it allows for further

development of the CMdb by

including the data into the CMdb

from other sources, such as asset

Management. this process, referred

to as federation, transforms the

CMdb into a federated CMdb such

that the source of the data retains

control of the data. this has become

a common practice in today’s

complex computing environments.

utilizing an independent CMdb as

the source of data for all of the it

assets for the bsM is more practical. it

allows the bsM solution to focus on

what it should, while ensuring the

availability of a reliable source of data.

furthermore, it leads to a less

complex solution architecture for the

bsM.

J. OPEN SOURCE APPROACH:

OFFERINGS AND LIMITATIONS

in recent years, the open source

software industry has gained a huge

popularity and been a key competitor

to market leaders, who have been

driving the industry for years, as

shown in figure 3. similarly, open

source bsM tools and solutions have

been popular and widely adopted at

the enterprise level.

they aim to associate the concepts of

both open source and propriety

software together. that said, they

offer the flexibility of open source

solutions. users can access the source

code and customize the solution to

the business needs. they can also

integrate with third party solutions, at

no additional cost, to expand their

capabilities. often times, these

integrations are provided as an out-

of-the-box feature utilizing generic

Table 3: Main Differences between Fragmented and Unified BSM Solutions.

DetaiLs

administration overhead

higher for fragmented solutions.

installation requirements

Generally, fragmented solutions tend to

need more components.

cost

Generally, higher for the fragmented

solutions.

functionality offerings

More capabilities are usually offered by

fragmented solutions.

Figure 3: Gartner’s DC Audience Current and Future Monitoring Platforms.